‘Food Inc’ can throw a scare into any eater
Steven Rea
In this article, Rea points out a very valid point. Though this is not the most comforting documentary to watch, it is essential in order to get the point across when it comes to what our food industry is really all about. I know, personally, before watching this film, I had always heard that the food we eat could be bad, but I had to see it for myself for it to really make an impact. The article talks about how a startling issue in our society is secrecy. Consumers are lacking basic information regarding their eating choices. Food Inc. does not abide by this secrecy. “He’s out to scare people - parents with young children, low-income families who depend on fast foods to get by, politicians, and food safety officials, all of us. And he succeeds.” These words could not be said better. This film has to catch everyone’s attention. Corporations have succeeded for so long in concealing the truth. Though we may not want to hear it, we need to listen! Food Inc. is there to provide this information.
Steven Rea, in his supporting article, is reassuring this idea of the necessity of this information. Though I was very disgusted and uncomfortable at the end of the film, I am now so much more aware of what I eat and where it is coming from. Hopefully many more Americans will reading this supportive article and, in turn, choose to view the film, expanding alertness even more.
“But Food, Inc. is an essential one.”
Been There, Bun That
Kyle Smith
This is a very short article in response to the film Food Inc. Mr. Kyle Smith briefly speaks about how the audience of this film are more than likely already aware of the food industry’s process. Those that do not want to stop eating meat or choose to ignore the dangers will simply not watch this film. However, on the contrary, I can guarantee that not everyone in our class on Tuesday wanted to watch helpless chickens being shoved into tubes as well as innocent cows slaughtered. As a result, I can see where the author of this criticism is coming from, but at the same time, educating a few new individuals is better than none at all.
The source of this article is the New York Post. Therefore, this article was written regarding one individual’s opinion. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I do not believe that I am completely convinced of his argument. Yes, those who choose to watch this may already know much of the information, but I can guarantee many watching this film have no idea what they are about to watch. Consequently, they are learning so much more about the hidden secrets of the food industries corporations hope not too many will ever see.
‘Food Inc.’ not for the squeamish
Amy Biancolli
Unlike the first two articles, this article by Amy Biancolli from the San Francisco Chronicle chooses to present a much more unbiased review of the film, Food Inc. As any neutral article would do, this article presents both sides of the argument: the pros and cons of the film. In support of Food Inc., Biancolli talks of the awareness the documentary brings to the table. On the other hand, it also talks of how the film is only a one-sided story. Though we may assume the other side’s story since many corporations declined an interview, but we cannot rely entirely on the information heard from only one side of the spectrum.
Through this article, the reader also finds very informative material on what the film is about overall. These unbiased articles are necessary in order to develop our own reaction to Food Inc. For example, if I only read negative responses to the film before stating my own opinion, I may lean towards criticism without even knowing it.
In the end, I believe a neutral article is the best way to receive an equal view on the film. One is assured to not feel swayed toward one opinion or the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment